10 beste alternatieven voor LawPay in 2026
Een sterk alternatief voor LawPay biedt uw kantoor veilige, conforme betalingsverwerking met naadloze factureringsfuncties en integraties die zijn ontworpen voor juridisch werk. Als u op zoek bent naar alternatieven voor LawPay, zoekt u waarschijnlijk naar betrouwbare manieren om betalingen te innen, derdengelden te beheren en juridische facturering te automatiseren—zonder gedoe of onzekerheid.
Deze gids introduceert de beste alternatieve oplossingen voor LawPay die juridische professionals gebruiken om cliëntgelden veilig te houden, facturering te stroomlijnen en handmatige taken te verminderen. Hier vindt u opties die zijn afgestemd op de behoeften van advocatenkantoren, zodat u de juiste oplossing voor uw praktijk kunt kiezen.
Wat is LawPay?
LawPay is een platform voor betalingsverwerking voor de juridische sector, ontworpen om advocatenkantoren te helpen creditcard-, debitcard- en ACH-betalingen te accepteren en tegelijkertijd te voldoen aan regelgeving binnen de sector. Het ondersteunt derdengeldenadministratie en het beheer van cliëntgelden om aan juridische en ethische verplichtingen te voldoen. LawPay integreert met software voor praktijkbeheer om facturering en afstemming te vereenvoudigen. Juridische professionals vertrouwen op LawPay voor het veilig en efficiënt innen van cliëntbetalingen, terwijl de bescherming van cliëntgelden wordt gewaarborgd.
Specificaties vergelijken
Beoordelingen van de beste alternatieven voor LawPay
Hieronder staan mijn uitgebreide samenvattingen van de beste alternatieven voor LawPay die op mijn shortlist zijn gekomen. In mijn beoordelingen kijk ik gedetailleerd naar de functies, integraties en beste gebruiksscenario’s van elk platform, zodat u de beste optie voor u kunt vinden.
| Tool | Best For | Trial Info | Price | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Best for automatic time tracking and billing | Free demo available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 2 | Best for time tracking and invoicing | 10-day free trial | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 3 | Best for integrated legal payments | Free demo available | From $79/user/month (billed annually) | Website | |
| 4 | Best for legal time and billing | 14-day free trial + free demo available | From $39/user/month (billed annually) | Website | |
| 5 | Best for configurable billing workflows | Free demo available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 6 | Best for trust accounting and payments | 10-day free trial + free demo available | From $99/user/month (billed annually) | Website | |
| 7 | Best for payment plans and billing | 10-day free trial + free demo available | From $59/user/month (billed annually) | Website | |
| 8 | Best for automated legal billing | Free trial + free demo available | From $49/user/month (billed annually) | Website | |
| 9 | Best for QuickBooks legal billing | 14-day free trial + free demo available | From $55/user/month | Website | |
| 10 | Best for legal payments and AR management | Not available | Pricing upon request | Website |
Why You Can Trust Us
We’ve been testing and reviewing legal software since 2023. As legal practice leaders ourselves, we know how critical and difficult it is to make the right decision when selecting software.
We invest in deep research to help our audience make better software purchasing decisions. We’ve tested more than 2,000 tools for different legal practice use cases and written over 1,000 comprehensive software reviews. Learn how we stay transparent & our software review methodology.
-
CARET Legal
Visit WebsiteThis rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.4.4 -
Redactable
Visit WebsiteThis rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.4.8 -
Insightful
Visit WebsiteThis rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.4.8
Best for automatic time tracking and billing
Smokeball is an all-in-one legal practice management platform for solo attorneys and small firms that combines trust accounting, client billing, and document automation in a single system.
Who Is Smokeball Best For?
Smokeball is a strong fit for small and solo firms that handle high document volumes across practice areas like real estate, family law, or estate planning.
Why Smokeball Is a Good LawPay Alternative
I've included Smokeball in my top picks because its AutoTime feature captures billable work automatically across emails, calls, and documents, without any manual input. What I particularly like is that this captured time feeds directly into Smokeball's billing module, so invoices reflect real work rather than best-guess estimates. Firms using it report an average 34% increase in profitability, which speaks to how much billable time typically goes unrecorded.
Smokeball Key Features
- Trust accounting with 3-way reconciliation: Manage trust and operating accounts while preventing commingling and ensuring IOLTA compliance.
- LEDES and matter-based invoicing: Generate invoices that support industry-standard billing codes required by many clients and courts.
- Native QuickBooks and Xero integration: Sync payments and expenses directly with popular accounting systems to reduce manual entry.
- Client portal for secure payments: Provide clients with a private portal to view invoices and submit payments online.
Smokeball Integrations
Smokeball offers native integrations with LawPay, QuickBooks Online, Xero, Microsoft 365, Outlook, InfoTrack, and DocuSign. An API is available for custom integrations.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Matter-based invoicing supports LEDES billing codes
- Built-in IOLTA trust account reconciliation included
- AutoTime captures billable hours without manual input
Cons:
- Not a standalone payment processing solution
- Available only in the US and Australia
TimeSolv
Best for time tracking and invoicing
TimeSolv is a legal billing and time tracking platform built for solo attorneys and small law firms that need IOLTA-compliant trust accounting, built-in payment processing, and automated invoicing in a single tool.
Who Is TimeSolv Best For?
TimeSolv is a strong fit for solo attorneys and small law firms that bill hourly and need trust-compliant payments without piecing together separate tools.
Why TimeSolv Is a Good LawPay Alternative
I picked TimeSolv as one of the best because its matter-based time tracking feeds directly into LEDES-compliant invoices, cutting the gap between recording hours and billing clients. I particularly like the batch invoicing feature, which lets me generate and send invoices across multiple matters in one pass. TimeSolvPay then routes collected funds automatically to the correct trust or operating account, removing any manual allocation step after a client pays.
TimeSolv Key Features
- Three-way trust account reconciliation: Enables precise IOLTA trust compliance with automated reconciliation workflows for all client funds.
- Secure client payment portal: Provides clients with a branded online portal for reviewing invoices, making payments, and accessing payment history.
- Customizable intake and CRM add-on: Includes configurable intake forms and lead tracking for firms handling client onboarding in-house.
- Bulk payment collection tools: Lets you collect payments across multiple clients or matters at once, streamlining high-volume billing.
TimeSolv Integrations
TimeSolv offers native integrations with QuickBooks, Xero, NetDocuments, Microsoft 365, Dropbox, LexShare, LexSign, LawPay, and AccountEdge. An API is available for custom integrations.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Batch invoicing across multiple matters simultaneously
- LEDES-compliant invoicing built into the platform
- Automated three-way trust account reconciliation included
Cons:
- Reporting customization options are fairly restricted
- Mobile app has limited offline functionality
Best for integrated legal payments
CARET Legal is a cloud-based legal practice management platform built for small to mid-sized law firms that need matter management, trust accounting, LEDES billing, and client payment processing in one place.
Who Is CARET Legal Best For?
It's a strong fit for small and mid-sized law firm billing administrators who manage trust accounts, client invoicing, and payment collection within a single platform.
Why CARET Legal Is a Good LawPay Alternative
I've included CARET Legal in my top picks because CARET Pay is woven directly into the practice management platform, not added as a separate tool. When a client pays a retainer through the branded client portal, it routes straight into trust accounting without manual reconciliation. I also like that credit card, ACH, and e-check payments tie natively to matter billing and LEDES invoicing, so payments and legal financials stay connected from the start.
CARET Legal Key Features
- Native document management: Store, organize, and edit documents directly within each client matter.
- Bi-directional calendar sync: Connect your Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace account for real-time calendar updates.
- Automated workflow templates: Build repeatable legal process templates for case intake, discovery, or document deadlines.
- LEDES invoice generation: Produce invoices in LEDES format to meet client and e-billing compliance requirements.
CARET Legal Integrations
CARET Legal offers native integrations with QuickBooks Online, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, NetDocuments, HotDocs, Lawmatics, and LawToolBox. An API is available for custom integrations.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Supports LEDES invoicing for e-billing compliance
- Branded client portal for online payments
- Trust accounting built into billing workflow
Cons:
- Mobile app has limited payment functionality
- Overkill for firms needing payments only
Bill4Time is a cloud-based time tracking, billing, and payments platform built specifically for law firms that want to consolidate invoicing, trust accounting, and client payment collection in one place.
Who Is Bill4Time Best For?
Bill4Time is a strong fit for solo attorneys and small law firms that need legal-specific billing, trust accounting, and client payments without juggling multiple tools.
Why Bill4Time Is a Good LawPay Alternative
I've included Bill4Time in my top picks because it handles the full billing cycle that LawPay leaves unaddressed. I particularly like that it supports hourly, flat fee, and contingency billing within the same matter, which is rare. Its LEDES export and UTBMS code set are built directly into the Legal Pro plan, so submitting electronic invoices to insurance carriers or corporate clients doesn't require a separate workaround.
Bill4Time Key Features
- Trust accounting automation: Enforces separation of earned and unearned funds and supports three-way reconciliation.
- Client portal: Lets clients securely view invoices, share documents, and make online payments.
- Conflict checker: Built-in tool to screen for client and matter conflicts before engagement.
- QuickBooks integration: Syncs time entries, invoices, and payment data directly with QuickBooks for accounting.
Bill4Time Integrations
Bill4Time offers native integrations with QuickBooks, NetDocuments, Box, and Google Calendar. An API is available for custom integrations.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Handles full billing cycle beyond payments
- Three-way trust account reconciliation built in
- Built-in LEDES billing and UTBMS codes
Cons:
- Reporting customization is limited
- Mobile app lacks full desktop functionality
Centerbase is a legal practice management platform built for midsized law firms that need native trust accounting, configurable billing workflows, and embedded payment processing — all without stitching together separate tools.
Who Is Centerbase Best For?
Centerbase is a strong fit for midsized law firms whose billing administrators and firm managers need highly configurable billing and trust accounting in a single platform.
Why Centerbase Is a Good LawPay Alternative
I picked Centerbase as one of the best because its billing workflow configurability goes beyond what a standalone payment processor can offer. I particularly like the ePreBill review feature, which routes pre-bills electronically up an approval chain before anything reaches the client. What really sets it apart: Centerbase is the only billing system that processes retainers and fee payments in a single credit card transaction, then automatically allocates funds to the correct trust or operating account.
Centerbase Key Features
- Automated time capture: Tracks billable hours passively across Outlook and Word without manual entry.
- Integrated document management: Lets you manage and store client documents within the same cloud platform.
- Multi-payor invoice support: Enables firms to allocate payments among multiple responsible parties on a single matter.
- Native trust accounting: Handles trust deposits, safeguards against commingling, and supports compliant reconciliation workflows.
Centerbase Integrations
Centerbase offers native integrations with QuickBooks Online, NetDocuments, iManage, LawToolBox, Plaid, LawPay, and has integrations across the Microsoft ecosystem including Microsoft 365 and Outlook. An API is available for custom integrations.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Native three-way trust account reconciliation
- Built-in ePreBill routing before client delivery
- Single transaction handles retainers and fees
Cons:
- Steep initial setup for billing configuration
- Designed for midsized firms, not solos
CosmoLex
Best for trust accounting and payments
CosmoLex is a cloud-based practice management platform built for solo and small law firms that handles trust accounting, billing, and client payments natively, without relying on a separate payment processor.
Who Is CosmoLex Best For?
CosmoLex is a strong fit for solo attorneys and small firm billing administrators who need trust accounting and client payments managed in one place without separate accounting software.
Why CosmoLex Is a Good LawPay Alternative
I picked CosmoLex as one of the best because its trust accounting module genuinely sets it apart. Every client gets their own trust ledger, and three-way reconciliation (bank statement, trust ledger, and individual client ledgers) runs automatically. CosmoLexPay routes payments directly to the correct trust or operating account at the point of collection, which removes the compliance risk that comes with manually splitting funds after the fact.
CosmoLex Key Features
- Client portal: Give clients secure access to invoices, documents, and payment links online.
- Integrated document management: Organize, store, and share matter-related files within each case.
- LEDES and split billing: Generate LEDES-compliant invoices and allocate fees across multiple clients or payers.
- Automated compliance reporting: Generate audit-ready reports for trust accounts and firm finances with preset legal templates.
CosmoLex Integrations
CosmoLex offers native integrations with QuickBooks Online, Microsoft 365, NetDocuments, LawPay, Dropbox, Google Calendar, and Zapier. An API is available for custom integrations.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Card-on-file storage for retainer replenishment
- Built-in e-signature for engagement letters
- Full practice management included beyond payments
Cons:
- Mobile access options are limited
- Not a standalone payment processor
Best for payment plans and billing
Rocket Matter is a legal practice management platform with a built-in payment processor designed to replace LawPay, handling trust-compliant billing, invoicing, and client payments inside a single system built for law firms.
Who Is Rocket Matter Best For?
Solo attorneys and small to mid-sized law firms that want to manage billing, payments, and matters in one platform rather than juggling separate tools.
Why Rocket Matter Is a Good LawPay Alternative
I picked Rocket Matter for my shortlist because of how it handles automated payment plans specifically. Store a client's card on file, set the billing schedule, and Rocket Matter charges automatically without any manual follow-up needed. I also appreciate the evergreen retainer feature: when a retainer balance drops below a set threshold, the platform replenishes it automatically from the stored payment method.
Rocket Matter Key Features
- Trust accounting automation: The platform automatically separates client funds, tracks trust transactions, and blocks processing fees from trust accounts.
- LEDES and split billing: Generate invoices with LEDES codes and split billing among multiple parties or funding sources.
- Document management and e-signature: Store, edit, and share legal documents securely with built-in e-signature to complete engagement agreements.
- QuickBooks Online integration: Sync invoices, payments, and client data with QuickBooks Online for unified legal accounting.
Rocket Matter Integrations
Rocket Matter offers native integrations with QuickBooks Online, NetDocuments, Microsoft 365, Dropbox, Box, LawToolBox, and Google Calendar. An API is also available for custom integrations.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- LEDES billing codes built into invoicing
- IOLTA trust accounting with three-way reconciliation
- Automated retainer replenishment when balance drops
Cons:
- Mobile app has limited payment functionality
- Overkill for firms only needing payments
Best for automated legal billing
PracticePanther is a cloud-based law practice management platform for solo attorneys and small firms that combines legal billing, trust accounting, client intake, and payment processing in one place.
Who Is PracticePanther Best For?
It's a strong fit for solo attorneys and small firm billing administrators who need a single platform to handle time tracking, invoicing, and trust accounting without juggling separate tools.
Why PracticePanther Is a Good LawPay Alternative
I picked PracticePanther because of how much of the billing cycle it automates end to end. I particularly like the automated payment reminders and recurring payment plans, which remove the manual follow-up that bogs down so many small firms. On top of that, LEDES billing and invoice read alerts give billing administrators real visibility into where each invoice stands without chasing clients down.
PracticePanther Key Features
- Matter-centric workflows: Customize legal task and calendar flows around each case, from start to finish.
- Integrated trust and operating accounting: Keep trust deposits and earned fees separated with built-in accounting tools.
- Native eSignature for engagement letters: Send, track, and store signed agreements directly within the platform.
- Two-way business texting: Communicate and archive client messages securely from a dedicated business SMS line.
PracticePanther Integrations
PracticePanther offers native integrations with QuickBooks Online, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Dropbox, MailChimp, LawPay, Box, and Zapier. An API is available for custom integrations.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- LEDES billing codes included natively
- Built-in IOLTA trust accounting compliance
- Automates invoicing, reminders, and recurring payments
Cons:
- Mobile app has limited billing functionality
- Reporting lacks depth for larger firms
New Product Updates from PracticePanther
PantherAccounting Plus Unveiled
PracticePanther launches PantherAccounting Plus, enhancing financial management for law firms. It enables law firms to manage trust and operating accounting directly within the platform. For more information, visit PracticePanther's official site.
.
LeanLaw is a legal billing platform for small and mid-sized law firms that combines time tracking, IOLTA trust accounting, invoicing, and e-payments inside a native QuickBooks Online workflow — replacing the need to layer separate payment tools on top of your billing stack.
Who Is LeanLaw Best For?
LeanLaw is a strong fit for solo attorneys and small law firms already running QuickBooks Online who want billing and trust accounting in one place.
Why LeanLaw Is a Good LawPay Alternative
I picked LeanLaw because its continuous two-way QuickBooks Online sync solves the core problem LawPay leaves behind. Every client payment posts automatically to the correct invoice and the right QBO account, with trust funds routed correctly by design. Built-in IOLTA reconciliation then tracks retainers, trust deposits, and disbursements without any manual entry outside QuickBooks.
LeanLaw Key Features
- LEDES e-billing: Generate invoices using LEDES and ABA task codes to meet corporate and insurance client requirements.
- Desktop and mobile time tracking: Capture billable time and expenses from desktop or mobile devices with one-tap timers.
- Compensation tracking: Monitor partner and staff compensation linked directly to matter performance data.
- Settlement wizard: Manage contingency matter settlements, lien payouts, and automated disbursement calculations within a dedicated workflow.
LeanLaw Integrations
LeanLaw offers native integrations with QuickBooks Online, NetDocuments, and Billables.ai. An API is available for custom integrations.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Matter-based time capture on mobile
- Built-in three-way IOLTA trust reconciliation
- Native QuickBooks Online two-way billing sync
Cons:
- No standalone client payment portal
- Requires active QuickBooks Online subscription
Headnote is a legal payments platform built for solo attorneys and small law firms that need IOLTA-compliant credit card and eCheck processing alongside automated AR management and collections.
Who Is Headnote Best For?
Headnote suits small law firms and solo practitioners who manage their own billing and want a no-contract, transaction-fee-only payment setup with built-in trust compliance.
Why Headnote Is a Good LawPay Alternative
I picked Headnote as one of the best because its AR automation goes beyond basic payment processing. The real-time dashboard shows exactly when a client has opened, viewed, or paid an invoice, and automated reminders fire based on net terms without any manual follow-up. I also appreciate the built-in NPS tracking, which is the first of its kind in legal payments and lets me monitor client satisfaction data right alongside collection activity.
Headnote Key Features
- Trust and operating account separation: Instantly link both trust and operating accounts in-app with safeguards against fee commingling.
- Engagement letters with e-signature: Generate engagement letters and collect secure electronic signatures during client intake.
- Payment link compatibility: Add payment links to invoices or email templates from tools like Clio, PracticePanther, and QuickBooks.
- PCI-compliant security: All payment data is protected by 256-bit SSL encryption and PCI Level 1 compliance safeguards.
Headnote Integrations
Headnote offers native integrations with Clio, Rocket Matter, CosmoLex, and QuickBooks. An API is available for custom integrations.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- No monthly fees, transaction-based pricing only
- Automated AR follow-up without manual intervention
- Built-in NPS tracking alongside payment activity
Cons:
- No LEDES billing or ABA task code support
- Limited practice management integrations compared to LawPay
Andere alternatieven voor LawPay
Hier zijn enkele aanvullende alternatieven voor LawPay die mijn shortlist niet hebben gehaald, maar die nog steeds de moeite waard zijn om te bekijken:
- EBizCharge
For integrated card and ACH payments
- Soluno
For legal accounting and billing
- PDCflow
For payment authorization workflows
How I Evaluate LawPay Alternatives
I split my evaluation into core functionality—what every LawPay alternative must offer, like IOLTA-compliant trust handling—and differentiators I look for beyond that. Core sets the baseline; differentiators reveal where platforms diverge.
Core Functionality (Table Stakes For This List)
When I'm selecting tools for my list, I rank each one on a scale from 0 (does not offer the functionality) to 5 (excels in this area) for each core functionality listed below. Then, I calculate the tool's total score into a percentage. Each tool needs to achieve a minimum total score of 65% to be considered for inclusion.
- IOLTA Trust Compliance: I check whether the platform separates trust deposits from earned fees and prevents processing fees from hitting trust accounts—a common compliance pitfall.
- Legal Payment Processing: Each tool should accept credit cards, debit cards, and ACH/eCheck payments with routing configured for both operating and trust accounts.
- Invoicing & Payment Links: I look for invoice generation with shareable payment links or hosted pages, so clients can pay directly from the invoice without extra steps.
- Practice Management Integrations: The platform should connect with tools firms already use, like Clio, MyCase, PracticePanther, or QuickBooks, to sync invoices and matter data.
- Surcharging & Fee Handling: I evaluate whether the tool supports compliant surcharging or convenience fees, giving firms flexibility in how they handle processing costs.
- Recurring Billing & Payment Plans: Firms doing retainer-based or installment work need scheduled charges and structured payment plans, so I look for automation in this area.
Once I have a list of tools that meet the criteria, I consider what sets each platform apart.
Differentiating Factors (What Sets Vendors Apart)
Here's how I compare and contrast different vendors:
Standout Features
Trust accounting automation is a big differentiator. I look for three-way reconciliation and built-in safeguards against commingling, since manual trust management is where compliance risks pile up. Surcharge and fee absorption options also matter—firms want the flexibility to pass processing costs to clients or absorb them, depending on bar rules. I also evaluate whether a platform offers built-in client intake with e-signatures, which eliminates the need for separate tools when onboarding new matters.
Beyond Features
Bar association endorsements carry real weight—I check whether a platform has documented approvals for handling trust funds, since that signals a vendor's commitment to ethics compliance. Pricing structure also matters a lot. Some platforms use interchange-plus models while others offer flat rates, and hidden costs like early termination fees can add up fast. I also evaluate firm size and practice area fit, because a solo immigration attorney and a mid-size personal injury firm have very different needs around permissions, settlement disbursements, and billing workflows.
Waarom zoeken naar een alternatief voor LawPay?
Hoewel LawPay een goede keuze is binnen de alternatieven voor LawPay, zijn er verschillende redenen waarom sommige gebruikers op zoek gaan naar andere oplossingen. Misschien zoekt u naar een alternatief voor LawPay omdat u…
- Lagere verwerkingskosten nodig hebt bij grote transactievolumes
- Meer native integraties met platforms voor praktijkbeheer wilt
- Geavanceerde functies voor het automatiseren van de derdengeldenadministratie nodig hebt
- Op zoek bent naar flexibelere opties voor toeslagen en kostenbeheer
- Cliënten bedient buiten de regio's die door LawPay worden ondersteund
- Betere klantenondersteuning zoekt die is afgestemd op advocatenkantoren
Als een van deze punten op u van toepassing is, bent u hier aan het juiste adres. Mijn lijst bevat verschillende alternatieven voor LawPay die beter geschikt zijn voor teams die met deze uitdagingen van LawPay te maken hebben en op zoek zijn naar alternatieve oplossingen.
Belangrijkste functies van LawPay
Hier zijn enkele van de belangrijkste functies van LawPay, zodat u kunt vergelijken wat alternatieve oplossingen te bieden hebben:
- Naleving van IOLTA-vertrouwensrekeningen: Houdt gelden van cliënten en het kantoor gescheiden, met waarborgen om te voldoen aan de nalevingsvereisten voor vertrouwensrekeningen.
- Juridische betalingsverwerking: Accepteert creditcard-, betaalkaart- en ACH-betalingen die zijn geconfigureerd voor facturering door advocatenkantoren en de behoeften van vertrouwensrekeningen.
- Betalingslinks en gehoste pagina's: Hiermee kunt u veilige, deelbare betalingslinks of betalingspagina's in de huisstijl van het kantoor genereren, zodat cliënten online kunnen betalen.
- Factuurintegratie: Verbindt met software voor juridische facturering, zodat facturen betalingen en afstemmingen automatisch synchroniseren.
- Periodieke facturering en betalingsregelingen: Ondersteunt geautomatiseerde terugkerende afschrijvingen en regelingen voor betaling in termijnen voor doorlopende zaken of zaken die door voorschotten worden gefinancierd.
- Toeslagen en gemakskosten: Hiermee kunnen kantoren verwerkingskosten voor creditcardbetalingen doorberekenen aan cliënten, waar dit is toegestaan, of de kosten binnen de wettelijke richtlijnen zelf dragen.
- Beheer van cliëntaccounts: Biedt tracking, geschiedenis en rapportage van cliëntbetalingen in één dashboard dat is ontwikkeld voor advocatenkantoren.
- Automatisering van naleving: Automatiseert audit trails, beschermt tegen vermenging van gelden en helpt bij het beheren van de regels van de ABA en staatsordes voor de verwerking van kosten.
- Integraties met praktijkbeheersoftware: Werkt samen met toonaangevende oplossingen voor praktijkbeheer, zoals Clio, MyCase en PracticePanther, voor een naadloze gegevensstroom.
- PCI-conforme beveiliging: Zorgt ervoor dat transacties voldoen aan industrienormen door gevoelige betalingsgegevens te versleutelen en hulpmiddelen voor fraudebewaking aan te bieden.