20 Best Legal Hold Software For Preserving Case Data In 2025
10 Best Legal Hold Software Shortlist
Here's my pick of the 10 best software from the 20 tools reviewed.
Get free help from our project management software advisors to find your match.
Legal hold software solves the problem of manual, error-prone preservation processes, which frees up your team to focus on high-impact work like case strategy, compliance oversight, and client communication. Managing legal holds and preserving data integrity can be time-consuming and legally risky, but the proper support can reduce liability exposure and streamline collaboration across departments.
In this article, I compare and review the best legal hold tools to support your buying decision.
Best Legal Hold Software Summary
| Tool | Best For | Trial Info | Price | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Best for comprehensive audit trail capabilities | Not available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 2 | Best for complex case management with robust tracking | Free demo available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 3 | Best for efficient eDiscovery and forensic internal investigations | Not available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 4 | Best for scalable legal eDiscovery with AI technology | Not available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 5 | Best for litigation holds and data retention | Not available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 6 | Best for streamlining legal operations through automation | Not available | From $45/user/month (billed annually). | Website | |
| 7 | Best for continuous security compliance and certification | Not available | Pricing upon request. | Website | |
| 8 | Best for data privacy and risk management | Not available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 9 | Best for process visibility with its comprehensive dashboards | Not available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 10 | Best for quick data discovery and review | Not available | From $250/user/month | Website |
-
CARET Legal
Visit WebsiteThis is an aggregated rating for this tool including ratings from Crozdesk users and ratings from other sites.4.8 -
Redactable
Visit Website -
Mitratech TAP Workflow Automation
Visit WebsiteThis is an aggregated rating for this tool including ratings from Crozdesk users and ratings from other sites.4.2
Best Legal Hold Software Reviews
Mitratech's LegalHold is a comprehensive SaaS solution designed to automate and manage the legal hold process for organizations. LegalHold ensures compliance with legal and regulatory requirements by overseeing the entire lifecycle of a legal hold, from issuance to release.
Why I Picked LegalHold: LegalHold maintains detailed logs of all actions taken within the system, from the issuance of legal holds to the acknowledgment of notices by custodians. This feature is invaluable for demonstrating compliance during audits and legal proceedings.
By providing a transparent and easily accessible record of all activities, LegalHold helps organizations mitigate risks associated with legal holds and ensures that they can respond accurately to any inquiries or challenges.
Standout Features & Integrations:
Features include a notification system that allows users to send automated, trackable notices to custodians, ensuring that all relevant parties are informed and compliant with legal hold requirements. The tool includes workflow automation capabilities and a dedicated portal for custodians.
Integrations include Active Directory, TeamConnect, and eCounsel.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Portal for custodians
- Audit trail capabilities
- Compliance reporting
Cons:
- Could offer more robust customization
- Potential learning curve for new users
OpenText is a powerhouse tool designed to simplify the legal hold process. It offers an array of functionalities to manage holds with accuracy, ensuring you never miss a beat. OpenText excels in handling intricate case management scenarios, providing a robust tracking system that suits complex legal environments.
Why I Picked OpenText: In my quest to find the perfect legal hold software, OpenText was a clear standout. I picked it for its impressive handling of complex case management scenarios, a feature I found to be unrivaled in its class.
This feature makes OpenText perfect for law departments and corporations dealing with multiple intricate cases simultaneously. The robust tracking capabilities make it easier to keep track of holds, ensuring compliance and reducing potential legal risks.
Standout Features & Integrations:
Features go beyond basic hold notifications or messaging, offering advanced tools like hold reminders, escalations, surveys, and status reports. The software also boasts an intuitive interface that's easy to navigate.
Integrations include the broader OpenText eDiscovery applications, ensuring a smooth transition of information from one process to another.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Intuitive interface
- Excellent for complex case management
- Robust tracking capabilities
Cons:
- Learning curve for non-technical users
- Higher cost compared to some alternatives
- Might be overkill for smaller firms
Nuix
Best for efficient eDiscovery and forensic internal investigations
NUIX serves as a comprehensive eDiscovery platform with dedicated legal hold capabilities. It is specifically designed to simplify the process of identifying, preserving, and analyzing data in legal cases.
Why I Picked NUIX: When it came to selecting NUIX, the tool's eDiscovery-centric focus made it stand out from the crowd. This specificity is what leads me to believe that it's best for firms seeking a legal hold solution tied tightly with eDiscovery solution.
Standout Features & Integrations:
Features include advanced search, analytics, document review, and metadata reporting capabilities, all support the intricate process of eDiscovery.
Integrations include various data sources, which allows it to capture and preserve data relevant for legal hold.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Wide range of data source integrations
- Advanced analytics and reporting
- Specialized in eDiscovery
Cons:
- Potential overcomplexity for smaller organizations
- May not be suitable for firms not engaged heavily in eDiscovery
- Pricing information is not transparent
Casepoint is an eDiscovery platform that provides comprehensive features for legal hold management. Its powerful features make it an effective tool for legal teams that need to manage and preserve electronically stored information (ESI) for potential litigation.
Why I Picked Casepoint: I selected Casepoint because of its strong emphasis on legal hold management, a crucial aspect of litigation. It not only provides robust functionality for this purpose but also adds a layer of intelligence that differentiates it from many other tools.
Considering its unique set of features tailored for legal hold scenarios, I judged it as the best for legal hold management.
Standout Features & Integrations:
Features include customizable legal hold notices, automatic reminders, and a user-friendly dashboard for easy tracking.
Integrations include a variety of data sources to manage holds effectively across diverse sets of data.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Able to integrate with multiple data sources for more effective holds
- User-friendly dashboard for easy tracking of legal holds
- Comprehensive set of features designed for legal hold management
Cons:
- Interface may not be as modern as some alternatives
- May have a learning curve for those unfamiliar with eDiscovery software
- Pricing information not readily available
DISCO Hold is a platform that enables legal professionals to manage, track, and enforce legal holds with ease. It is especially beneficial for handling large-scale legal hold projects, thanks to its scalability and robust feature set.
Why I Picked DISCO Hold: I picked DISCO Hold for this list due to its capabilities in efficiently manage large volumes of data. The robustness of this tool differentiates it and substantiates my opinion that it is best for large-scale legal hold projects.
Standout Features & Integrations:
Features include its capacity for handling large volumes of data, notification management, and the ability to track compliance.
Integrations include various email platforms, which allows for communication and tracking of legal hold notifications.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Integrates well with various email platforms
- Robust notification management system
- Handles large-scale projects efficiently
Cons:
- Potential learning curve for those unfamiliar with legal hold systems
- Might be overkill for smaller, simpler legal hold needs
- Pricing details are not transparent
OnitX is a robust legal hold software focused on streamlining legal hold processes through workflow automation. It stands out by promoting collaboration, providing a unified platform where teams can work together effectively.
Why I Picked OnitX: After careful comparison, I selected OnitX for its impressive capabilities in automating workflows, a feature that sets it apart. It's the collaboration aspect, however, that swayed my judgment.
In my view, this makes OnitX the best choice for firms or teams that value efficient teamwork and streamlined workflows in managing legal holds.
Standout Features & Integrations:
Features include automated hold notifications or messaging, detailed reporting, and a collaborative platform where teams can work cohesively. It also includes a 'release hold' feature, which can automatically release a hold when it's no longer necessary.
Integrations include enterprise software such as ERP and CRM systems, ensuring data flow across different platforms.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Stable integrations with enterprise systems
- Supports collaboration
- Excellent workflow automation
Cons:
- Can be complex to learn initially
- Pricing may not suit smaller budgets
- May have more features than needed for small teams
Drata is a tool designed to automate and streamline the process of maintaining and proving compliance. It's a one-stop shop for all compliance needs, making it ideal for organizations looking to save time and reduce manual work in their compliance management efforts.
Why I Picked Drata: I chose Drata for this list due to its unique emphasis on automation, which sets it apart from many other tools. Its ability to simplify and streamline compliance processes is what makes it stand out. With this in mind, I determined it to be the best tool for automated compliance management.
Standout Features & Integrations:
Features include automated control monitoring, evidence collection, and continuous compliance checks.
Integrations include a variety of platforms, such as cloud providers, identity providers, and project management tools, allowing businesses to monitor their entire tech stack in one place.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Continuous compliance checks ensure ongoing compliance
- Extensive list of integrations, covering a wide range of platforms
- Strong focus on automation to streamline compliance
Cons:
- Setup may require some technical know-how
- May be more complex than needed for businesses with less stringent compliance needs
- Pricing information is not readily accessible
OpenText EnCase Information Assurance is a powerful tool designed to help businesses manage and secure their data effectively. It is a comprehensive data governance solution, making it an excellent choice for organizations seeking a wide-ranging approach to data control and security.
Why I Picked OpenText EnCase Information Assurance: I selected OpenText EnCase Information Assurance because of its comprehensive nature and its deep capabilities in the realm of data governance. This tool presents an effective blend of data search, classification, and security features, making it different from other legal hold tools.
That's why I believe it is best suited for comprehensive data governance.
Standout Features & Integrations:
Features include extensive search capabilities, sophisticated classification of data, and robust security features, including data loss prevention.
Integrations include a variety of other data systems and platforms, enabling organizations to manage data across multiple sources.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Robust data loss prevention features
- Offers extensive search and classification capabilities
- Comprehensive data governance solution
Cons:
- Setup and deployment may be complex compared to simpler tools
- The extensive suite of features may be overwhelming for small teams
- Pricing information is not readily available
Acuity, a product of Mitratech, serves as an integrated risk management platform that provides legal hold functionality. Its purpose is to help organizations understand, manage, and mitigate risk while fulfilling legal obligations.
Why I Picked Acuity: The reason I picked Acuity for this list is its focus on offering a comprehensive risk management solution, something that distinguishes it from many other tools. I believe Acuity is best for organizations that need to tie their legal hold processes into a larger risk management strategy.
Standout Features & Integrations:
Features include legal hold process automation, robust reporting and risk assessment capabilities.
Integrations include Mitratech's suite of legal and compliance management tools, allowing data flow between systems and unified risk management.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Integration with Mitratech suite
- Process automation
- Comprehensive risk management
Cons:
- Could be an overkill for firms seeking just legal hold software
- Might be too complex for smaller organizations
- Pricing not readily available
Logikcull is a cloud-based or SaaS legal hold software designed for straightforward eDiscovery. It simplifies the process of identifying, preserving, and analyzing potentially relevant information in a legal case.
Why I Picked Logikcull: I chose Logikcull because its intuitive interface and powerful eDiscovery capabilities differentiate it from other options. In my opinion, Logikcull is best for users who value simplicity without compromising on advanced eDiscovery features.
Standout Features & Integrations:
Features include its user-friendly design and efficient search capabilities. You can apply filters, tag documents, and automate repetitive tasks to accelerate eDiscovery.
Integrations include popular platforms such as Google Workspace and Office 365, and Slack, which allows easy access to data across various sources.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Integrates with popular platforms
- Efficient search capabilities
- Intuitive interface
Cons:
- Pricing could be a factor for small firms or teams
- Limited customization options
- Advanced features may require a learning curve
Other Legal Hold Software Tools
Below is a list of additional legal hold software I shortlisted but did not make it to the top 10. Definitely worth checking them out.
- ZDiscovery
For litigation response with its pre-built hold templates
- Concourse
For ensuring regulatory compliance with strong governance
- Pagefreezer
For web content archiving and preservation
- Mitratech TAP Workflow Automation
For custom legal hold workflows
- Everlaw
Good for visualizing data connections
- CrashPlan
Good for providing data backup with legal hold functionalities
- Kiteworks
Good for secure collaboration alongside legal hold functions
- Exterro
Good for managing complex e-discovery processes
- Thread
Good for enhancing legal team collaboration
- ESI365
Good for managing the entire lifecycle of a legal hold
Other Legal Software Reviews
Here are some other popular types of legal software you might be interested in.
What is Legal Hold Software?
Legal hold software is a tool that automates the preservation of electronically stored information for litigation or investigation. It’s used by legal teams, compliance officers, and HR professionals to manage legal holds efficiently, eliminating manual tracking, reducing risk of spoliation, and ensuring defensible processes.
Need expert help selecting the right tool?
With one-on-one help, we guide you to your top software options. Narrow down your software search & make a confident choice.
Selection Criteria For Legal Hold Software
When choosing legal hold software, there are several key considerations to take into account. I've evaluated numerous legal hold tools, but in this case, I was particularly interested in how these tools handled data management, ease of use, and robustness of features.
Core Functionality
- Issue Legal Holds: It's essential that the tool can easily issue legal holds to ensure data is preserved for potential litigation.
- Track Acknowledgements: Keeping track of who has acknowledged receipt of a legal hold is critical for maintaining a defensible process.
- Automate Reminders: To ensure that those on hold continue to preserve their data, the tool needs to be able to send automated reminders.
- Release Holds: Once a case is closed or a person is no longer subject to the hold, the tool should facilitate releasing the hold.
Key Features
- Integration Capabilities: It's essential that the legal hold software can integrate with other systems in an organization, like email or HR systems.
- Scalability: The tool should be able to accommodate both small and large numbers of holds, as well as single custodian and multi-custodian holds.
- Reporting: Detailed reports are crucial to keep track of the status of holds, compliance rates, and overall program effectiveness.
- Audit Trails: The tool should create detailed records of all legal hold activities to ensure defensibility.
Usability
When it comes to usability, I believe that legal hold software should offer:
- Intuitive Interface: Legal hold software should be easy to navigate, even for those without a technical background. Menus should be clearly labeled and actions should be straightforward.
- Onboarding and Customer Support: Providers should offer comprehensive onboarding to get teams up to speed quickly, as well as ongoing customer support to assist with any issues.
- Role-based Access: The tool needs to provide role-based access that is simple to configure to ensure data security and maintain confidentiality.
- Accessibility: The software should be accessible across various devices, including mobile, to ensure functionality no matter where users are located.
People Also Ask
What are the benefits of using legal hold software?
Using legal hold software offers several benefits, including:
- Improved Compliance: Legal hold software can help ensure that your organization remains compliant with legal obligations related to data preservation.
- Efficiency: Automated notifications, reminders, and tracking of legal holds save time and reduce the manual effort involved in the process.
- Defensibility: Detailed audit trails created by the software can provide a defensible record of your legal hold process.
- Centralized Management: Legal hold software provides a central location to manage all holds, making it easier to get an overview of the status and impact of legal holds across your organization.
- Risk Reduction: By automating the legal hold process, you can minimize the risk of spoliation and the potential for severe penalties.
How much do these legal hold tools cost?
The cost of legal hold software varies greatly depending on the complexity of the tool, the size of the organization, and the specific features required. Many vendors do not openly disclose pricing but instead offer customized quotes based on your specific needs.
What are the typical pricing models for legal hold software?
Pricing models for legal hold software are typically either subscription-based or based on the number of users or custodians. Subscription pricing is often billed annually, and user-based pricing involves a cost per user or per custodian on hold.
What is the typical range of pricing for legal hold software?
Given the customized nature of most legal hold software pricing, it’s challenging to provide a definitive range. However, it’s not uncommon for costs to range from a few hundred to several thousand dollars per month, depending on the tool’s complexity, the number of users, and the level of customer support required.
What are some of the cheapest and most expensive legal hold software options?
Drata and Everlaw are typically some of the more cost-effective options, while tools like OpenText EnCase Information Assurance tend to be on the higher end of the spectrum. However, the cost can greatly vary depending on specific needs and the size of the organization.
Are there any free options for legal hold software?
As of my last review, there were no free legal hold software options available. Most providers offer a paid service due to the specialized nature of the tools and the high level of customer support often required.
Other Case Management Software Reviewed
Here are some other tools you may need if you are looking for matter and case management software solutions.
What Next?
For more legal insights and resources, subscribe to The Legal Practice newsletter and join a community of innovative legal practitioners shaping the future of law.