Skip to main content

Navigating the intricacies of law practice management, I understand how demanding it can be. That's why I stand by the effectiveness of legal hold software. These innovative tools, in a nutshell, simplify and automate the legal hold process, making life much easier for you and your team. By incorporating one of these solutions, you not only streamline your workflow but also enhance your IT team's compliance and efficiency. Gone are the days of misplacing crucial documents or failing to meet hold requirements.

One of the major pain points these tools address is the cumbersome process of manual legal holds. Juggling between deadlines, preserving data, and dealing with ever-changing legal requirements can be daunting. However, with reliable legal hold software, you can alleviate these stressors. I encourage you to explore these selections and discover the transformative power they can bring to your practice.

Legal hold software is a specialized tool designed to help law firms, service providers, corporate legal teams, and other legal professionals manage the legal hold process efficiently. Legal hold software automates the process of preserving data for legal cases. It helps organizations manage, track, and enforce legal hold orders, ensuring that relevant information is not altered or destroyed during litigation.

These software solutions enable the automation of numerous tasks, including sending hold notifications, preventing deletion, tracking acknowledgment from custodians (people who possess relevant information), automating reminders, managing spreadsheets, and providing a defensible legal hold of the entire process. The goal is to avoid time-consuming and the spoliation of evidence, streamline workflows, collect data, enhance compliance with legal obligations, and ultimately reduce the risk of court sanctions or adverse judgments.

Best Legal Hold Software Summary

Tools Price
Mitratech TAP Workflow Automation Pricing upon request
Mitratech LegalHold Pricing upon request
OpenText Pricing upon request
Nuix Pricing upon request
Casepoint Pricing upon request
OnitX From $45/user/month (billed annually).
ZDiscovery Pricing upon request
Logikcull From $250/user/month
OpenText EnCase Information Assurance Pricing upon request
DISCO Hold Pricing upon request
Compare Software Specs Side by Side

Compare Software Specs Side by Side

Use our comparison chart to review and evaluate software specs side-by-side.

Compare Software

Best Legal Hold Software Reviews

Best for custom legal hold workflows

  • Pricing upon request
Visit Website
Rating: 4.2/5

Mitratech TAP Workflow Automation is a flexible workflow automation platform designed to serve legal and compliance teams. It supports organizations in structuring their operations to reduce administrative overhead and improve efficiency across various business functions.

Why I Picked Mitratech TAP Workflow Automation: It simplifies legal hold procedures by enabling fully automated workflows tailored to legal needs. It offers a customizable platform that supports the complete lifecycle of legal holds, from initiation to release. This ensures that your team can quickly trigger, monitor, and track holds without manual intervention. TAP’s reporting and notification capabilities also allow you to keep stakeholders informed throughout the process and prevent hold-related oversights. The system also includes document preservation functions that support your team’s record-keeping responsibilities.

Standout Features & Integrations:

Standout features include audit trail, compliance tracking, and document management capabilities that can provide robust support for handling sensitive case data. These features allow your team to stay organized while adhering to strict privacy and compliance regulations. Integrations include DocuSign, Adobe eSignature, TeamConnect, and VendorInsight.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Facilitates real-time collaboration
  • Capable of scaling across various functions
  • Customizable, automated workflows

Cons:

  • Could offer more integrations
  • Advanced features can be complex to implement

Best for comprehensive audit trail capabilities

  • Pricing upon request
Visit Website
Rating: 4.2/5

Mitratech's LegalHold is a comprehensive SaaS solution designed to automate and manage the legal hold process for organizations. LegalHold ensures compliance with legal and regulatory requirements by overseeing the entire lifecycle of a legal hold, from issuance to release.

Why I Picked LegalHold: LegalHold maintains detailed logs of all actions taken within the system, from the issuance of legal holds to the acknowledgment of notices by custodians. This feature is invaluable for demonstrating compliance during audits and legal proceedings. By providing a transparent and easily accessible record of all activities, LegalHold helps organizations mitigate risks associated with legal holds and ensures that they can respond accurately to any inquiries or challenges.

Standout Features & Integrations:

Standout features include a notification system that allows users to send automated, trackable notices to custodians, ensuring that all relevant parties are informed and compliant with legal hold requirements. The tool includes workflow automation capabilities and a dedicated portal for custodians. Integrations include Active Directory, TeamConnect, and eCounsel.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Portal for custodians
  • Audit trail capabilities
  • Compliance reporting

Cons:

  • Could offer more robust customization
  • Potential learning curve for new users

Best for complex case management with robust tracking

  • Free demo available
  • Pricing upon request
Visit Website
Rating: 4.2/5

OpenText is a powerhouse tool designed to simplify the legal hold process. It offers an array of functionalities to manage holds with accuracy, ensuring you never miss a beat. OpenText excels in handling intricate case management scenarios, providing a robust tracking system that suits complex legal environments.

Why I Picked OpenText: In my quest to find the perfect legal hold software, OpenText was a clear standout. I picked it for its impressive handling of complex case management scenarios, a feature I found to be unrivaled in its class. This feature makes OpenText perfect for law departments and corporations dealing with multiple intricate cases simultaneously. The robust tracking capabilities make it easier to keep track of holds, ensuring compliance and reducing potential legal risks.

Standout Features & Integrations:

OpenText goes beyond basic hold notifications or messaging, offering advanced features like hold reminders, escalations, surveys, and status reports. The software also boasts an intuitive interface that's easy to navigate. OpenText integrates with the broader OpenText eDiscovery applications, ensuring a smooth transition of information from one process to another.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Intuitive interface
  • Excellent for complex case management
  • Robust tracking capabilities

Cons:

  • Learning curve for non-technical users
  • Higher cost compared to some alternatives
  • Might be overkill for smaller firms

Best for efficient eDiscovery and forensic internal investigations

  • Pricing upon request
Visit Website
Rating: 4.5/5

NUIX serves as a comprehensive eDiscovery platform with dedicated legal hold capabilities. It is specifically designed to simplify the process of identifying, preserving, and analyzing data in legal cases.

Why I Picked NUIX: When it came to selecting NUIX, the tool's eDiscovery-centric focus made it stand out from the crowd. This specificity is what leads me to believe that it's best for firms seeking a legal hold solution tied tightly with eDiscovery solution.

Standout Features & Integrations:

NUIX's features, including advanced search, analytics, document review, and metadata reporting capabilities, all support the intricate process of eDiscovery. The tool also integrates well with various data sources, which allows it to capture and preserve data relevant for legal hold.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Wide range of data source integrations
  • Advanced analytics and reporting
  • Specialized in eDiscovery

Cons:

  • Potential overcomplexity for smaller organizations
  • May not be suitable for firms not engaged heavily in eDiscovery
  • Pricing information is not transparent

Best for scalable legal eDiscovery with AI technology

  • Pricing upon request
Visit Website
Rating: 4.9/5

Casepoint is an eDiscovery platform that provides comprehensive features for legal hold management. Its powerful features make it an effective tool for legal teams that need to manage and preserve electronically stored information (ESI) for potential litigation, aligning it with its 'best for' category of Legal Hold Management.

Why I Picked Casepoint: I selected Casepoint because of its strong emphasis on legal hold management, a crucial aspect of litigation. It not only provides robust functionality for this purpose but also adds a layer of intelligence that differentiates it from many other tools. Considering its unique set of features tailored for legal hold scenarios, I judged it as the best for legal hold management.

Standout Features & Integrations:

Casepoint offers a set of features to aid in legal hold management, including customizable legal hold notices, automatic reminders, and a user-friendly dashboard for easy tracking. The platform can also integrate with a variety of data sources to manage holds effectively across diverse sets of data.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Able to integrate with multiple data sources for more effective holds
  • User-friendly dashboard for easy tracking of legal holds
  • Comprehensive set of features designed for legal hold management

Cons:

  • Interface may not be as modern as some alternatives
  • May have a learning curve for those unfamiliar with eDiscovery software
  • Pricing information not readily available

Best for streamlining legal operations through automation

  • From $45/user/month (billed annually).

OnitX is a robust legal hold software focused on streamlining legal hold processes through workflow automation. It stands out by promoting collaboration, providing a unified platform where teams can work together effectively.

Why I Picked OnitX: After careful comparison, I selected OnitX for its impressive capabilities in automating workflows, a feature that sets it apart. It's the collaboration aspect, however, that swayed my judgment. In my view, this makes OnitX the best choice for firms or teams that value efficient teamwork and streamlined workflows in managing legal holds.

Standout Features & Integrations:

OnitX is packed with standout features such as automated hold notifications or messaging, detailed reporting, and a collaborative platform where teams can work cohesively. It also includes a 'release hold' feature, which can automatically release a hold when it's no longer necessary. Regarding integrations, OnitX provides connections to enterprise software such as ERP and CRM systems, ensuring data flow across different platforms.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Stable integrations with enterprise systems
  • Supports collaboration
  • Excellent workflow automation

Cons:

  • Can be complex to learn initially
  • Pricing may not suit smaller budgets
  • May have more features than needed for small teams

Best for litigation response with its pre-built hold templates

  • Pricing upon request

ZDiscovery is a cloud-based legal hold and eDiscovery software designed to aid legal departments in managing litigation response. The software simplifies the eDiscovery process, making it ideal for companies looking to streamline their in-house eDiscovery.

Why I Picked ZDiscovery: In choosing ZDiscovery, its ability to facilitate an efficient and simplified eDiscovery process stood out. Its comprehensive, user-friendly features cater to both small and large-scale eDiscovery projects. Given these aspects, I judged ZDiscovery to be best for streamlining the eDiscovery process.

Standout Features & Integrations:

ZDiscovery offers a robust suite of eDiscovery tools, including legal hold notification, custodian surveys, and data preservation capabilities. It integrates with various data sources, including Office 365, allowing access and management of data.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Robust integration with data sources like Office 365
  • Comprehensive, user-friendly features
  • Simplifies the eDiscovery process

Cons:

  • Limited integration with non-Microsoft platforms
  • May be more features than needed for very small legal teams
  • Pricing information is not publicly available

Best for quick data discovery and review

  • From $250/user/month

Logikcull is a cloud-based or SaaS legal hold software designed for straightforward eDiscovery. It simplifies the process of identifying, preserving, and analyzing potentially relevant information in a legal case.

Why I Picked Logikcull: I chose Logikcull because its intuitive interface and powerful eDiscovery capabilities differentiate it from other options. In my opinion, Logikcull is best for users who value simplicity without compromising on advanced eDiscovery features.

Standout Features & Integrations:

Logikcull shines with its user-friendly design and efficient search capabilities. You can apply filters, tag documents, and automate repetitive tasks to accelerate eDiscovery. Logikcull also offers integrations with popular platforms such as Google Workspace and Office 365, and Slack, which allows easy access to data across various sources.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Integrates with popular platforms
  • Efficient search capabilities
  • Intuitive interface

Cons:

  • Pricing could be a factor for small firms or teams
  • Limited customization options
  • Advanced features may require a learning curve

Best for data privacy and risk management

  • Pricing upon request

OpenText EnCase Information Assurance is a powerful tool designed to help businesses manage and secure their data effectively. It is a comprehensive data governance solution, making it an excellent choice for organizations seeking a wide-ranging approach to data control and security.

Why I Picked OpenText EnCase Information Assurance: I selected OpenText EnCase Information Assurance because of its comprehensive nature and its deep capabilities in the realm of data governance. This tool presents an effective blend of data search, classification, and security features, making it different from other legal hold tools. Thus, I believe it is best suited for comprehensive data governance.

Standout Features & Integrations:

OpenText EnCase Information Assurance offers extensive search capabilities, sophisticated classification of data, and robust security features, including data loss prevention. It integrates effectively with a variety of other data systems and platforms, enabling organizations to manage data across multiple sources.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Robust data loss prevention features
  • Offers extensive search and classification capabilities
  • Comprehensive data governance solution

Cons:

  • Setup and deployment may be complex compared to simpler tools
  • The extensive suite of features may be overwhelming for small teams
  • Pricing information is not readily available

Best for litigation holds and data retention

  • Pricing upon request

DISCO Hold is a platform that enables legal professionals to manage, track, and enforce legal holds with ease. It is especially beneficial for handling large-scale legal hold projects, thanks to its scalability and robust feature set.

Why I Picked DISCO Hold: I picked DISCO Hold for this list due to its capabilities in efficiently manage large volumes of data. The robustness of this tool differentiates it and substantiates my opinion that it is best for large-scale legal hold projects.

Standout Features & Integrations:

Key features of DISCO Hold include its capacity for handling large volumes of data, notification management, and the ability to track compliance. Notably, DISCO Hold integrates with various email platforms, which allows for communication and tracking of legal hold notifications.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Integrates well with various email platforms
  • Robust notification management system
  • Handles large-scale projects efficiently

Cons:

  • Potential learning curve for those unfamiliar with legal hold systems
  • Might be overkill for smaller, simpler legal hold needs
  • Pricing details are not transparent

Other Legal Hold Software Tools

Below is a list of additional legal hold software I shortlisted but did not make it to the top 10. Definitely worth checking them out.

  1. Concourse

    Best for ensuring regulatory compliance with strong governance

  2. Drata

    Best for continuous security compliance and certification

  3. Pagefreezer

    Best for web content archiving and preservation

  4. Acuity

    Best for process visibility with its comprehensive dashboards

  5. CrashPlan

    Good for providing data backup with legal hold functionalities

  6. Everlaw

    Good for visualizing data connections

  7. Kiteworks

    Good for secure collaboration alongside legal hold functions

  8. Alt Legal

    Good for intellectual property professionals seeking legal hold capabilities

  9. Legal Hold Pro

    Good for user-friendly legal hold tracking

  10. Knovos

    Good for a comprehensive approach to legal hold management

Selection Criteria For Legal Hold Software

When choosing legal hold software, there are several key considerations to take into account. I've evaluated numerous legal hold tools, but in this case, I was particularly interested in how these tools handled data management, ease of use, and robustness of features.

Core Functionality

  • Issue Legal Holds: It's essential that the tool can easily issue legal holds to ensure data is preserved for potential litigation.
  • Track Acknowledgements: Keeping track of who has acknowledged receipt of a legal hold is critical for maintaining a defensible process.
  • Automate Reminders: To ensure that those on hold continue to preserve their data, the tool needs to be able to send automated reminders.
  • Release Holds: Once a case is closed or a person is no longer subject to the hold, the tool should facilitate releasing the hold.

Key Features

  • Integration Capabilities: It's essential that the legal hold software can integrate with other systems in an organization, like email or HR systems.
  • Scalability: The tool should be able to accommodate both small and large numbers of holds, as well as single custodian and multi-custodian holds.
  • Reporting: Detailed reports are crucial to keep track of the status of holds, compliance rates, and overall program effectiveness.
  • Audit Trails: The tool should create detailed records of all legal hold activities to ensure defensibility.

Usability

When it comes to usability, I believe that legal hold software should offer:

  • Intuitive Interface: Legal hold software should be easy to navigate, even for those without a technical background. Menus should be clearly labeled and actions should be straightforward.
  • Onboarding and Customer Support: Providers should offer comprehensive onboarding to get teams up to speed quickly, as well as ongoing customer support to assist with any issues.
  • Role-based Access: The tool needs to provide role-based access that is simple to configure to ensure data security and maintain confidentiality.
  • Accessibility: The software should be accessible across various devices, including mobile, to ensure functionality no matter where users are located.

People Also Ask

What are the benefits of using legal hold software?

Using legal hold software offers several benefits, including:

  1. Improved Compliance: Legal hold software can help ensure that your organization remains compliant with legal obligations related to data preservation.
  2. Efficiency: Automated notifications, reminders, and tracking of legal holds save time and reduce the manual effort involved in the process.
  3. Defensibility: Detailed audit trails created by the software can provide a defensible record of your legal hold process.
  4. Centralized Management: Legal hold software provides a central location to manage all holds, making it easier to get an overview of the status and impact of legal holds across your organization.
  5. Risk Reduction: By automating the legal hold process, you can minimize the risk of spoliation and the potential for severe penalties.

How much do these legal hold tools cost?

The cost of legal hold software varies greatly depending on the complexity of the tool, the size of the organization, and the specific features required. Many vendors do not openly disclose pricing but instead offer customized quotes based on your specific needs.

What are the typical pricing models for legal hold software?

Pricing models for legal hold software are typically either subscription-based or based on the number of users or custodians. Subscription pricing is often billed annually, and user-based pricing involves a cost per user or per custodian on hold.

What is the typical range of pricing for legal hold software?

Given the customized nature of most legal hold software pricing, it’s challenging to provide a definitive range. However, it’s not uncommon for costs to range from a few hundred to several thousand dollars per month, depending on the tool’s complexity, the number of users, and the level of customer support required.

What are some of the cheapest and most expensive legal hold software options?

Drata and Everlaw are typically some of the more cost-effective options, while tools like OpenText EnCase Information Assurance tend to be on the higher end of the spectrum. However, the cost can greatly vary depending on specific needs and the size of the organization.

Are there any free options for legal hold software?

As of my last review, there were no free legal hold software options available. Most providers offer a paid service due to the specialized nature of the tools and the high level of customer support often required.

Summary

In summary, selecting the best legal hold software depends on various factors, including core functionality, key features, usability, and cost. It's essential to carefully assess your specific needs and thoroughly research available tools.

Key takeaways:

  1. Core Functionality: The chosen legal hold software should enable you to send notices, automate follow-ups, maintain an audit trail, and manage all legal holds in one centralized place.
  2. Key Features and Usability: The software should be intuitive and user-friendly, with key features like customizable templates, real-time tracking, data collection, robust reporting, and integrations with existing systems. The ideal software will also offer strong customer support to assist with onboarding and ongoing queries.
  3. Cost: Consideration of cost is crucial. Look at both the immediate and long-term costs, considering the number of users, features required, and the level of customer support needed. Always clarify pricing models with the vendors and ensure that there are no hidden fees.
Ben Aston
By Ben Aston

Ben Aston is an online media entrepreneur and founder of Black & White Zebra, an indie media company on a mission to help people and organizations succeed.

Since 2011, he has been evaluating, reviewing, and helping to recommend software through hundreds of articles across the company's influential digital publications, seeking to make technical workplace topics fun and easier to understand.